Recession Risk 44/100 — March 28, 2026
US recession risk over the next 90 days is elevated but not high: the Sahm Rule is not triggered (0.27 vs 0.50 trigger), and initial claims remain low (~210k for the week ending March 21, 2026). ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/a9e2c1400bf45f89217a0bf9aa7f4af2?utm_source=openai)) The yield curve is decisively positive (2s10s about +56 bps), and manufacturing is still in expansion with ISM Manufacturing PMI at 52.4 in February 2026. ([ismworld.org](https://www.ismworld.org/globalassets/pub/research-and-surveys/rob/pmi/blud202602pmi.pdf?utm_source=openai)) The main near-term concern is the Conference Board LEI continuing to fall (down 0.2% in January 2026; 6‑month momentum weakening), alongside clear softening in labor-market flow/quantity metrics (February payrolls -92k; unemployment 4.4%). ([conference-board.org](https://www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/press/US%20LEI%20Technical%20Notes-Feb%202026.pdf?utm_source=openai)) Net: absent a shock, this looks like a slowdown/fragile expansion rather than an imminent recession, but the leading indicators and hiring data argue for defensive readiness.
Recession Risk Score: 44/100 — ELEVATED
Today’s read is a slowdown-with-fragile-footing setup—not an imminent recession call. The highest-frequency labor stress signals (initial claims and continuing claims) remain calm, and the yield curve is comfortably positive, both of which typically argue against a recession arriving “out of nowhere” in the next few months. But the leading side of the dashboard is deteriorating (LEI trend/breadth, temp help, freight, confidence), and the flow side of the labor market is weakening (payrolls, quits), raising the odds that a mild growth stall turns into something more self-reinforcing if hiring fails to re-accelerate in April.
Key Drivers
1) Labor market: low-layoff, low-hire is still holding—but hiring softness is the vulnerability
- Initial jobless claims: 210k (week ending Mar 21, 2026)—still consistent with limited layoffs. The 4-week average ~210.5k also remains steady, reinforcing the “no layoff wave yet” message. (apnews.com)
- Continuing claims: ~1.82M (week ending Mar 14, 2026)—down meaningfully in the latest release, which is not what you typically see right before a broad labor break. (apnews.com)
Why this matters: recession risk rises sharply when claims trend higher for multiple weeks and continuing claims stops improving. For now, that hasn’t happened.
2) Yield curve: positive 2s10s reduces near-term recession odds
- Your tracker has 2s10s ~ +56 bps, which is firmly “normal” and historically more consistent with expansion than with imminent recession. Why this matters: the curve is not a timing tool by itself, but a decisively positive curve removes a major classic recession warning that dominated earlier inversion regimes.
3) Leading indicators: LEI is still a headwind
- The Conference Board LEI has been running negative on recent prints (your notes cite -0.2% m/m in Jan 2026 and weakening momentum), consistent with late-cycle slowdown dynamics. Why this matters: persistent LEI deterioration often shows up before layoffs spike. It’s the “storm clouds” signal—even when the labor market still looks okay.
4) Manufacturing & production: expansionary headline, but cyclicals are sending mixed signals
- ISM Manufacturing PMI: 52.4 (Feb 2026)—still in expansion, modestly down from January. (ismworld.org)
- Your industrial production index: 102.6 (SAFE) reinforces that the hard-production side isn’t collapsing. Watch item: in prior cycles, the employment components and new orders matter more than the headline once growth is late-cycle—especially with tariffs/geo uncertainty affecting orders.
5) Financial conditions: not “tight,” but credit is no longer getting easier
- Your HY OAS level (~320 bps) is not a crisis reading, but the direction matters: widening spreads are one of the fastest ways to transmit weaker growth into hiring restraint (via tighter financing and weaker animal spirits).
6) Policy backdrop: Fed hold, but oil/geopolitics complicate the reaction function
- The Fed held the target range at 3.50%–3.75% on Mar 18, 2026, a second straight pause per mainstream coverage. (schwab.com)
- Powell’s Mar 18, 2026 press conference materials indicate the SEP still sketches a downward path in rates into year-end (your cited document shows end-year and next-year dots). (federalreserve.gov)
Why this matters: a Fed that’s willing to ease if growth weakens can cap downside—unless inflation re-accelerates (energy) and ties their hands.
90-Day Indicator Trends (direction of travel)
Below I use your 90-day history and focus on trend, inflections, and what’s “changing fastest.”
Labor (high-frequency)
- Initial claims: roughly ~199k–232k range since early January, with the latest around ~210–213k. Net: stable-to-slightly higher vs early Jan, but still benign.
- Unemployment rate: essentially flat near 4.3% across most of the 90-day series, with your “today” read at 4.4% (WATCH). Net: up a notch, not a break.
- Sahm Rule: 0.30 → 0.27 (safe direction). Net: moving away from trigger, not toward it.
Growth nowcasts / activity
- Atlanta Fed GDPNow: 5.4% (Jan 21) → 3.0% (Feb 19) → 1.8% (late Feb/early Mar) in your history. Net: clear deceleration impulse over ~6–8 weeks.
Credit / risk appetite
- HY OAS: around ~281–287 bps (late Dec) → ~310–312 bps (late Feb) → ~297 bps (early Mar). Net: wider vs 90 days ago, with some recent stabilization.
- NFCI: stays around -0.56 to -0.52. Net: financial conditions remain easy/normal overall, not recessionary.
Markets (risk-on still, but choppy)
- S&P 500: ~6906 (Dec 29) → ~6831 (Mar 7) in your series: mild drawdown, not a panic.
- VIX: mostly mid-to-high teens, but with repeated spikes into the 20–23 range in Feb/early Mar. Net: more “nervous” than “fearful.”
Liquidity plumbing
- ON RRP: collapses from triple digits late Dec to near-zero / low single-digit billions by late Jan/Feb in your series. Net: the “cash buffer” sitting at the Fed is largely drained, which can amplify funding-market sensitivity if a shock hits.
Cyclical “early warning” cluster (most concerning)
- Temp help: sits at ~2480k (danger) and your “today” shows 2447k—temp help is often a front-edge labor indicator. Net: deteriorating / recession-leaning signal.
- Freight index: flips from +1.3 to -0.5 in early March. Net: sharp negative swing—goods economy is weak.
- Copper/Gold: drops to 0.00077 (danger) in early March and remains pinned. Net: extreme defensiveness in cyclicals.
Bottom line from the 90-day tape: the labor layoff channel is not confirming recession, but the leading/cyclical complex is flashing more caution than markets are pricing—hence ELEVATED rather than LOW.
Latest Economic Developments (past ~48 hours focus + key recent releases)
Jobless claims: steady, supportive
- The most recent weekly claims release shows claims at 210,000 for the week ending Mar 21, with the 4-week average ~210,500 and continuing claims ~1.82M. (apnews.com)
This is the strongest near-term argument against a recession starting immediately.
Fed: on hold, monitoring uncertainty
- Coverage around the Mar 18 FOMC meeting emphasized a hold at 3.50%–3.75%, with attention on uncertainty (including geopolitics/oil) and how it may affect inflation and growth. (kiplinger.com)
- Powell’s Mar 18 press conference document indicates an SEP path that still leans to gradual easing (conditional on data). (federalreserve.gov)
Manufacturing: still expanding
- ISM Manufacturing PMI (Feb): 52.4—a second month in expansion territory and not consistent with an imminent industrial recession. (ismworld.org)
Near-Term Outlook (Next 30 Days)
Base case (most likely): soft growth prints, but no “layoff cascade.” The risk score stays roughly 40–50 unless labor worsens quickly.
Catalysts that could move the score higher fast:
- Initial claims trend breaks above ~240k–260k for several weeks (especially if continuing claims turns up decisively).
- A second consecutive weak payroll signal that looks broad-based (not weather/one-off/strike payback).
- Credit spreads widen meaningfully (e.g., HY OAS pushing well beyond the low-300s toward the 400s).
Catalysts that could move the score lower:
- Payroll growth reverts positive with a stable unemployment rate, and
- LEI diffusion stabilizes (fewer components negative) while temp help stops falling.
Long-Term Outlook (3–6 Months)
The economy looks like it’s transitioning from “resilient expansion” to “fragile expansion,” where the main risk is feedback loops:
- Hiring slows → 2) income growth slows → 3) spending cools → 4) profits compress → 5) credit tightens → 6) layoffs rise
Right now, we’re clearly in steps (1) and parts of (3), but we are not yet in a broad (6). The curve being positive helps, and financial conditions are not tight. But temp help + freight + confidence are consistent with late-cycle behavior where recession risk can jump with a single shock (energy spike, credit event, policy uncertainty).
What to Watch
Labor (highest priority)
- Initial claims: sustained move above 240k (watch), 260k (warning), 280k (danger).
- Continuing claims: reversal from ~1.8M to a rising multi-week trend.
- Unemployment rate: another +0.2–0.3 pp increase from 4.4% would materially change the narrative.
Leading / cyclical
- Temp help: any further sharp downside confirms employer caution.
- Freight: stays negative vs snaps back—this often tracks real goods demand.
- Copper/gold: stabilization would be an early “risk is fading” hint; continued depression keeps the caution flag up.
Credit / liquidity
- HY OAS: acceleration wider (trend matters more than a single tick).
- Money-market plumbing: with RRP largely depleted in your series, watch for signs of funding stress if volatility rises.
Policy
- Fed communication and inflation/energy developments that could either (a) allow a more supportive easing path if growth weakens, or (b) force the Fed to stay restrictive if inflation re-accelerates.
RecessionPulse takeaway: 44/100 (ELEVATED) is the right posture: defensive readiness without calling a recession that the high-frequency labor data still refuses to confirm. The next decisive move in the score will almost certainly come from claims/continuing claims and credit spreads—not from equity levels.